Partly allowed

Sanjay Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Aug 2022CR. MISC./29345/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to six of seven petitioners, excepting petitioner No. 3, who faced arrest threats in a criminal case involving assault and property theft. The order set specific bond amounts and sureties while invoking Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to petitioners except petitioner No. 3, subject to furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties to the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad.

Sanjay Sharma Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29345 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-219 Year-2018 Thana- SAKURABAD District- Jehanabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjay Sharma S/O Late Ramji Sharma R/O Village-Pokhwan, P.SShakurabad, District-Jehanabad.

¶5

Ajay Sharma S/O Late Ramji Sharma R/O Village-Pokhwan, P.SShakurabad, District-Jehanabad.

¶6

Mukul Kumar S/O Sanjay Sharma R/O Village-Pokhwan, P.S-Shakurabad, District-Jehanabad.

¶7

Vipul Kumar S/O Sanjay Sharma R/O Village-Pokhwan, P.S-Shakurabad, District-Jehanabad.

¶8

Venkatesh Kumar @ Vankatesh Kumar S/O Navleen Sharma R/O VillagePokhwan, P.S-Shakurabad, District-Jehanabad.

¶9

Gautam Kumar S/O Navleen Sharma R/O Village-Pokhwan, P.SShakurabad, District-Jehanabad.

¶10

Rajeev Kumar S/O Harishankar Sharma R/O Village-Pokhwan, P.SShakurabad, District-Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 22-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶17

learned APP for the State.

¶18

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

¶19

a case registered for the offences punishable under

¶20

Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 326, 354, 379, 448,

¶21

504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29345 of 2021(3) dt.22-08-2022 2/3

¶23

The prosecution case as per F.I.R is that all the

¶24

F.I.R named accused persons including petitioners, variously armed started assaulting the husband and son of the informant and when the informant and her other son came to their rescue, they were also assaulted by the accused persons. The accused persons also taken away cash and gold ornaments of the informant.

¶25

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that informant are agnates and in the background of some land dispute, the present F.I.R has been registered. There is counter version of the occurrence also and petitioners’ side also received injuries. There is no accusation of repeating the blow. It is further submitted that after investigation, the police has not submitted charge-sheet against the petitioners under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶26

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, except petitioner No. 3, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29345 of 2021(3) dt.22-08-2022 3/3

¶28

below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SubDivisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Shakurabad P.S. Case No. 219 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶29

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶30

Shageer/-

¶31

U T

Sanjay Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Mehta @ Pawan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Subash Sahani @ Bittu Sahani @ Biltu Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Mahto @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Mehta Vs The State of Bihar

Anand Yadav @ Anand Ray @ Raja Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Singh @ Rahul Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Kabita Devi Vs The State of Bihar