The High Court at Patna allowed the petitioner's application to withdraw her criminal miscellaneous petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition accorded; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17783 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2020 Thana- SARAIYA District- Muzaffarpur
====================================================== Kabita Devi W/O Pankaj Ram Resident Of Village - Miya Pakri, P.S.- Kanti, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shankar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
2 22-08-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw the petition.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Shageer/-
U T
Kabita Devi
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
