Allowed

Rahul Mahto @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Mehta v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC12 Aug 2022CR. MISC./8045/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners facing charges under Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for illicit liquor possession, directing release within four weeks upon furnishing bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bail bonds with two sureties within four weeks following arrest or surrender.

Rahul Mahto @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Mehta Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8045 of 2022

¶3

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-305 Year-2021 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Rahul Mahto @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Mehta Sond Of Late Naresh Mehta Resident Of Village- Jaipur, P.S.- Gurua, District- Gaya

¶6

Sikandar Mahto @ Sikandar Kumar Son Of Mahendra Mahto Resident Of Village- Jaipur, P.S.- Gurua, District- Gaya

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

2 12-08-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶12

learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

¶14

a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a)(d) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

¶15

There are recoveries of illicit liquors and one

¶16

motorcycle. Two persons were apprehended from the spot who named the petitioners as their associates.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners were not apprehended from

¶18

the spot. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8045 of 2022(2) dt.12-08-2022 2/2

¶20

possession of the petitioners and except confessional statement of co-accused, no any cogent material was

¶21

found against the petitioners. The seized place and motorcycle do not belong to the petitioners. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

¶22

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest

¶23

or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 2, Gaya in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 305 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶25

Shageer/-

¶26

U T

Rahul Mahto @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Mehta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Mahto @ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Mehta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Gulam Server @ Md. Gulam Sarwar Vs The State of Bihar

Ganesh Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Mehta @ Pawan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Subash Sahani @ Bittu Sahani @ Biltu Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar