Allowed

Ramkaran Yadav @ Kumbhkaran Yadav @ Tarachand Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Sept 2022CR. MISC./25250/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna, on the basis that the petitioner was not apprehended at the spot of liquor recovery and had no possession thereof, granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the Special Judge, Excise, Bettiah, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

Ramkaran Yadav @ Kumbhkaran Yadav @ Tarachand Yadav Vs The… — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25250 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2022 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramkaran Yadav @ Kumbhkaran Yadav @ Tarachand Yadav S/O Late Bijali Yadav R/O Village- Mirzapur, P.S.- Bettiah Muffasil, District- West Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 02-09-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a

¶14

case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act.

¶15

There is recovery of 30 litres of country brewed

¶16

liquor from the bushes on the bank of river.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner was not apprehended from the

¶18

spot. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious

¶19

possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25250 of 2022(2) dt.02-09-2022 2/2

¶21

concern with the seized liquor. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner is accused

¶22

in one other case apart from the present one.

¶23

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 193 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶25

Shageer/-

¶26

U T

Ramkaran Yadav @ Kumbhkaran Yadav @ Tarachand Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramkaran Yadav @ Kumbhkaran Yadav @ Tarachand Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Mukhtar Vs the State of Bihar

Mister Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Rajiv Kumar @ Birendra Kumar Vidyarthi Vs The State of Bihar

Rafik @ Md. Rafik Alam Vs The State of Bihar