Application for anticipatory bail in a murder case rejected as complicity appears established. Petitioner directed to surrender for regular bail.
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected;petitioner directed to surrender for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6044 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2021 Thana- UDAKISHUNGANJ District-
Madhepura
======================================================
MD. MUKHTAR S/O LATE MOHAMMAD MIYA @ MD. MIAN R/o village- Karauti, Nahar Tola Ward No. 14, P.S.- Udakishunganj, DistrictMadhepura
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
3 01-09-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State and perused the case diary.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 120(B), 363 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is a case of murder of the informant’s son, namely, Md. Jetun @ Guddu aged about 17 years.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has falsely been implicated in this case as he has committed no offence.
In contra, learned APP for the State has vehementally opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that para-49 and 50 of the case diary clearly shows the complicity of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6044 of 2022(3) dt.01-09-2022 2/2
the petitioner and from perusal of the postmortem report, it appears that the deceased had sustained multiple injures and bleeding from nose and cause of death is an asphyxia due to throttling.
After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Brajesh Kumar/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in a murder case involving offences under Sections 302, 147, 148, 120(B), 363 of IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Mukhtar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
