Hearing a bail petition in a case of abduction, the High Court allowed anticipatory bail on bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, directing surrender within four weeks.
Grant of anticipatory bail on bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to surrender within four weeks if arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3791 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-352 Year-2020 Thana- BISFI District- Madhubani
======================================================
SACHIN KUMAR @ SACHIN KUMAR SHARMA Son of Roudi Sharma @ Raudi Sharma @ Raudi Thakur Resident of Village- Bhatra Ghat, P.S.- Bisfi, District- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
3 01-09-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366A, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is a case of abduction of the informant’s daughter by the petitioner along with the accused persons.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that vide para-55 of the case diary, the victim was recovered and she gave her statement under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. that she had went away on her own sweet will with co-accused Rahul Kumar Das at Delhi and lived there as
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3791 of 2022(3) dt.01-09-2022 2/2
husband and wife. He further submits that main allegation is against co-accused Rahul Kumar Das and not against this petitioner and there is no complicity of the petitioner in this case in committing abduction of the victim girl. Petitioner has clean antecedent.
Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.
Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-I, Benipatti, Madhubani in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 352 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Brajesh Kumar/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the appellant who is apprehending arrest in an abduction case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sachinus Kumar @ Sachinus Kumar Sharma
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
