An oral order allowing anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case instituted for offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC relating to recovery of loan amount, subject to statutory conditions.
Petitioner allowed anticipatory bail subject to conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2404 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2016 Thana- PIRI BAZAR District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
Arun Kishore Mishra, Male aged about 65 years, Son of Dhiraj Mishra, Resident of Village - Katehar, P.S.- Surajgarha, District - Lakhisarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
3 07-02-2022
Heard the parties through video conferencing.
The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in
connection with Piribazar P.S. Case No. 10 of 2016 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.
The case relates to recovery of loan amount and there is dispute relating to huge amount. Prima facie , no case under Sections 420 and 406 is said to be made out against the petitioner.
Taking into consideration, the nature of allegation and the offence alleged, I am inclined to allow the petitioner on bail, in the event of arrest he shall be released on anticipatory bail,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2404 of 2020(3) dt.07-02-2022 2/2
subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Anand Kr.
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case involving dispute over recovery of loan amount under Sections 420 and 406 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arun Kishore Mishra
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Singh
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
