Allowed

Umesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Mar 2022CR. MISC./20131/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-paragraph order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner, who was apprehended of arrest under sections 498A and 506 IPC. The court noted a compromise between the parties and directed the petitioner to surrender to the lower court to be relieved on bail.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks to be enlarged on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Umesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Matrimonial and Divorce | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20131 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-479 Year-2020 Thana- CHOUTARWA District- West

¶3

Champaran

¶4

======================================================

¶5

UMESH KUMAR Son of Sri Dinanath Baitha Resident of Village - Banuchhapar, Devnagar, Ward No. 11, P.S.- Bettiah Muffasil (Banuchhapar), District - West Champaran, Presently posted as Branch Manager, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, Branch- Anjua Sugauli, P.S.- Shikarpur, District - West Champaran.

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar

¶9

Dolly Daughter of Md. Alamgir Resident of Village - Raibari Mahuawa, P.S.- Chautarwa, District - West Champaran.

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 09-03-2022

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Chautarwa P.S. Case no. 479 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 498A and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

Petitioner is husband and the matter relates to harassment and torture to the informant wife.

¶17

It is asserted by learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the informant that now good sense

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20131 of 2021(4) dt.09-03-2022 2/2

¶19

has been prevailed between the petitioner and his wife and the matter has been compromised between them out side the Court.

¶20

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

¶21

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Chautarwa P.S. Case no. 479 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Bagaha, West Champaran subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶23

sushma/-

¶24

Umesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Ibrahim Vs The State of Bihar

Parmeshwar Murmu Vs the State of Bihar

MD Ali Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Mokhtar Vs The State of Bihar

Anita Kumari @ Anita Kumar Vs The State of Bihar