Allowed

Md. Ibrahim v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Mar 2022CR. MISC./4858/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving dowry-related cruelty. The bail is subject to the condition that the petitioner must be present with his wife when executing the bail bonds before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount, conditioned on appearing with the wife while executing bonds.

Md. Ibrahim Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4858 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2019 Thana- BHAPTIAHI District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. IBRAHIM S/o Md. Abbas Resident of Village- Nonpar, P.S.- Bhaptiyahi, Distt- Supaul.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Sahana Khatoon W/o Ibrahim, D/o Md. Jumman Minya Resident of VillageNanpur, P.S.- Bhuptiyahi, Distt- Supaul, Presently Resident of VillageDubiyahi, P.S.- Pipra, Distt- Supaul

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Kumar Mehta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

8 08-03-2022

¶14

Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323 and 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶16

It is a case of cruelty against the informant (Opposite Party No.2) due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the spouses are already living together

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4858 of 2020(8) dt.08-03-2022 2/2

¶19

presently.

¶20

Considering the aforestated facts, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Bhaptiyahi P.S. Case No. 45 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further condition that the petitioner shall remain present along with his wife at the time of filing of bail bonds before the trial court.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

Brajesh Kumar/-

¶23

U T

Md. Ibrahim v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Ibrahim v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punam Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Uma Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Vindhyachal Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Parmeshwar Murmu Vs the State of Bihar

Dipak Rai Vs the State of Bihar