Allowed

Ram Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Mar 2022CR. MISC./16353/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner apprehending arrest under Section 498A IPC in a dowry harassment case. The petitioner, an Internet Chalan, was allowed bail on furnishing bonds with two sureties, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail on furnishing Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of like amount.

Ram Kumar Sah Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16353 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2019 Thana- SITAMARHI COMPLAINT CASE District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ram Kumar Sah Son Of Ram Sakalsah @ Ramasakal Shah R/o villageManpur, P.S.- Manpur, District- Sitamarhi

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Ragini Kumari W/o Ram Kumar Sah R/o village- Manpur, P.S.- Manpur, District- Sitamarhi

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

======================================================

¶11

Appearance :

¶12

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Prasad Singh, APP

¶13

======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶15

4 08-03-2022 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶16

APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

It is a case of assault and harassment to the complainant (O.P. No.2) for non-fulfilling the dowry as demanded by her in-laws.

¶19

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that both parties have filed a petition bearing Matrimonial Suit No. 176 of 2021 for getting their mutual

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16353 of 2021(4) dt.08-03-2022 2/2

¶21

divorce vide Annexure-3 of the Supplementary Affidavit. He further submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence and they are leaving separately since 01.09.2016.

¶22

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶23

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Pupari, Sitamarhi in connection with Complaint Case No. 35 of 2019 corresponding to Trial No.3470 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶25

Brajesh Kumar/-

¶26

U T

Ram Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Kumar Sah v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Punam Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Uma Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Vindhyachal Prasad Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Ibrahim Vs The State of Bihar

Parmeshwar Murmu Vs the State of Bihar

Dipak Rai Vs the State of Bihar