An application for anticipatory bail was dismissed as the case diary revealed a need for custodial investigation under Section 302 IPC, leading the court to deny the prayer.
Anticipatory bail was denied; the application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18620 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2017 Thana- CHANDRADIP District- Jamui
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
4 16-02-2022 This matter has been placed through video
conferencing.
This case adjourned earlier also.
Learned counsel for the State is present.
Case diary has been called for examining the fact of
the case, which is registered under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The custodial investigation of the petitioners are required. In view thereof I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
This application is dismissed.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Shamshad/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when custodial investigation is required.
If the application for anticipatory bail should be allowed or dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Md. Mahtab Alam
Salik
The State of Bihar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
