The High Court at Patna allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw application CM No. 895 of 2022 via video conferencing and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw application via video conferancing was granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.895 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-216 Year-2021 Thana- MAHISHI District- Saharsa
====================================================== DEEPAK PASWAN SON OF LATE BECHU PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- MANOWAR ISLAMPUR TOLA, P.S- MAHISHI (JALAI), DIST- SAHARSA
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Satish Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
2 16-02-2022 Heard the parties through video conferencing.
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw this application through video conferencing.
Prayer is allowed.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Shamshad/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application through video conferencing.
DEEPAK PASWAN
THE STATE OF BIHAR
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
