The High Court of Patna granted a prayer to withdraw an application via video conferencing and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw application through video conferencing allowed; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60843 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2020 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
======================================================
RAMJANAM BIND Son of Late Bishwanath Bind Resident of Village - Tarawn, P.s.- Belaon, Distt.- Kaimur at Bhabua.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks
permission to withdraw this application through video conferencing.
Prayer is allowed.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Shamshad/-
U T
RAMJANAM BIND
The State of Bihar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
