Allowed

Ayush Jayshwal @ Ayush Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Sept 2022CR. MISC./17143/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing conditional release upon arrest or surrender, subject to furnishing a bond and complying with Cr.P.C. 438(2).

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to be released on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks, subject to furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and complying with Section 438(2) of the

Ayush Jayshwal @ Ayush Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17143 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-401 Year-2021 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ayush Jayshwal @ Ayush Kumar Son Of Raju Jaiswal @ Kana Resident Of Village- Guljarbagh Dharmshala, P.S.- Alamganj, Distt- Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/S

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Kumari Sujata Sinha Mr. Upendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 26-09-2022

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶10

APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 365, 366(A), 341, 323, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 06.10.2021 at 2.00 P.M., informant’s minor daughter had left the house, but did not return on which, search was made, but she was not located. It is further alleged that petitioner a week back had threatened the informant of kidnapping his daughter at an auto stand.

¶13

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17143 of 2022(3) dt.26-09-2022 2/2

¶15

petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present. It is next submitted that the victim came back and her statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. wherein she has not supported the prosecution case.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

¶17

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Bypass P. S. Case No.401 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

The application stands allowed.

¶19

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶20

vikash/-

¶21

U T

Ayush Jayshwal @ Ayush Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayush Jayshwal @ Ayush Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Laichi Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Pratima Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Binay Rai @ Binay Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Fanindra Kumar Pandey Vs the State of Bihar

Chunnu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar