came and assaulted him but then the FIR does not even remotely suggest or reflect that petitioner and the informant are related, learned counsel thus submits that the same has been deliberately done to give an impression that petitioner is an outsider and who on account of land dispute committed the occurrence along with his family members and unknown accused. Learned counsel further submits that though against the petitioner it is alleged that he assaulted by an iron rod on head of the informant but it missed and the informant got injury on his shoulder but then even presuming what has been alleged is true then the injury is on non-vital part of the body, it is further submitted that to give a serious color to the case, the allegation of firing has been alleged when no such occurrence ever took place, learned counsel further submits that even the informant has manipulated the injury report of his son showing that he got injury in his eyes when admittedly from the FIR itself it would be evident that Amit fired at the left eye of the son of the informant but the shot misfired, it is thus submitted that when the shot itself misfired, where was the occasion for causing any injury in the eye of the son of the informant.
