Partly allowed

Naushad Aalam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Apr 2022CR. MISC./15650/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court modified an order relating to the petitioner's bail, correcting a jurisdictional error by designating the correct Additional Sessions Judge-Special Judge (Excise) and district to whom the bail bond and sureties must be furnished.

What did the court decide?

Modification of the order dated 18.02.2022 to specify the correct authority (Additional Sessions Judge-2-cum-Special Judge (Excise), East Champaran) for furnishing the bail bond and sureties.

Naushad Aalam Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15650 of 2022

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67125 of 2021

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2021 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Naushad Aalam, Son Of Md. Majlum, Resident Of Village - Sahuriya, P.S.Jankinagar, District - Purnia, Bihar

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 13-04-2022

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The present bail application has been filed seeking modification of the order dated 18.02.2022 in Cr. Misc. No.67125 of 2021, but on account of typographical error in the bail application, it was recorded in the order dated 18.02.2022 that “the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Samastipur in connection with Pipra P. S. Case No.202 of 2021”, but the same ought to have been to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-2-cum-Special Judge

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15650 of 2022(2) dt.13-04-2022 2/2

¶16

(Excise), East Champaran in connection with Pipra P. S. Case No.202 of 2021.

¶17

Let the order dated 18.02.2022 in Cr. Misc. No.67125 of 2021 be modified to read as that “the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/(Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-2-cum-Special Judge (Excise), East Champaran in connection with Pipra P. S. Case No.202 of 2021”.

¶18

The modification petition is allowed to the extent indicated above.

¶19

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶20

vikash/-

¶21

U T

Naushad Aalam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naushad Aalam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjit Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Rai @ Vijay Kumar @ Prasant Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Ful Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Sachchidanand Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md.Rubez Alam @ MD Rubez Vs The State of Bihar

Prem Raj Vs The State of Bihar