Oral order rejecting a modification application against an impugned order in a criminal miscellaneous matter, as the court felt no persuasion to alter the prior decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15616 of 2022
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32825 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-737 Year-2020 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali
======================================================
Prem Raj, S/O Jay Prakash Kumar R/O Village- Dayalpur, P.S.- Rajapakar (Waranti O.P.), District- Vaishali
... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh- Sr. Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha- A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
... ... Opposite Party/s
2 13-04-2022 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
In nature of the pleadings made in the modification application, the Court does not feel persuaded to modify the order dated 29.11.2021 in Cr. Misc. No.32825 of 2021.
Accordingly, the modification application is rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
Prem Raj
The State Of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
