Navin Kumar @ Navin Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, examining a petition for anticipatory bail in an alleged excise offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 206, held that the nature of allegations did not warrant granting bail. The prayer was rejected.
What did the court decide?
The prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected as the court was not inclined to grant it based on the nature of allegations.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12674 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2020 Thana- AKBARPUR District- Nawada
======================================================
NAVIN KUMAR @ NAVIN YADAV S/o Balmiki Yadav R/o villageMastanganj, P.S.- Akbarpur, District- Nawada
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Birendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
- 2 04-01-2022 Heard the parties through video conferencing.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Akbarpur P.S. Case No. 08 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 206.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with the alleged offence under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 206.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Navin Kumar @ Navin Yadav
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court