Md. Haider v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court rejected the application for anticipatory bail filed by MD. Haider in connection with a case under the Bihar Excise Prohibition Amendment Act, 2018. The court held that prima facie evidence indicated the petitioner supplied illicit liquor, precluding bail.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; investigation to be conducted by police.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12668 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2020 Thana- BHIMPUR District- Supaul
======================================================
MD. HAIDER S/o- Makbul Hussain R/o Village- Koily, Ward No. 11, P.S.Birpur, District- Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shiv Sager Sharma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
2 04-01-2022
- Heard the parties through video conferencing.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to the grant of anticipatory bail in a case regarding supply of illicit liquor?
Whether the prima facie evidence of supply of illicit liquor precludes the grant of anticipatory bail?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MD. HAIDER S/o- Makbul Hussain
Coram
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court