High Court at Patna considered an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in Kartaha P.S. Case No. 75 of 2020 involving IPC offences. Bail was denied due to independent eyewitness presence at the crime scene.
Application for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 12512 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2020 Thana- KARTAHA District- Vaishali
======================================================
Vishal Kumar @ Nagmani, aged about 35 years, Old, Son of Sh. Raju Singh, R/o Village, Post and P.S.- Kartaha, District- Vaishali, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
5 21-02-2022 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Kartaha P.S. Case No. 75 of 2020 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Having notice from the case diary that name of the petitioner has been mentioned by the independent eye witnesses to be present at the site and taking into consideration the nature of injuries, I do not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
This application is dismissed.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Anand Kr.
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail in view of eyewitness testimony and nature of injuries.
10 provisions across 1 enactments
Vishal Kumar @ Nagmani
The State of Bihar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
