The petitioner filed for anticipatory bail in connection with PS Case No. 381 of 2021 involving IPC offences. The court noted a lack of case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act but dismissed the bail prayer considering the rejection of bail for the co-accused.
Prayer for bail of the petitioner is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53560 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-381 Year-2021 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur
======================================================
RAMESH MAHTO Son of Jagdish Mahto @ Jagdish Prasad Resident of Village - Ibrahim Nagar, P.S.- Ara Town, Distt.- Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shivam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 381 of 2021, instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no case under Section 30 (a) of Excise Act is made out, however, considering that the bail application of co-accused has been rejected by this Court, I am not inclined to grant bail to this petitioner, therefore, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is dismissed.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
sanjeev/- U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner given the rejection of bail for co-accused.
Whether a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act is made out.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ramesh Mahto
The State of Bihar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
