Allowed

Mohit Kumar @ Mohit Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Dec 2022CR. APP (SJ)/522/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed this appeal against the Children Court's refusal to grant bail to a juvenile. Holding that the lower court’s reasoning lacked evidentiary basis, the court set aside the rejection and directed the release of the appellant on bail with an undertaking from his parents.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order rejecting bail set aside; appellant enlarged on bail on execution of a surety bond by parents/guardians.

Mohit Kumar @ Mohit Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.522 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2021 Thana- BHANGWANPUR HAT District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MOHIT KUMAR @ MOHIT SINGH SON OF SANTLAL SINGH R/O VILLAGE- PANIADIH, P.S.- BHAGWANPUR, DISTRICT- SIWAN UNDER THE GUARDIANSHIP OF HIS MOTHER DEVANTIU DEVI WIFE OF SANTLAL SINGH

¶5

... ... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Ram Awadhesh Ram S/o Late Babulal Ram R/o Village- Ratan Panroli Tiwary Tola, P.S.- Bhapanwan pur Hat, Distt- Siwan,

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Basant Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Vishesh Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Saharsh Shubham, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶12

6 08-12-2022

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned

¶14

Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

¶15

Despite service of notice, no one has appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 2.

¶16

This is an appeal under Section 101(5) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 against refusal of the prayer for bail to the appellant by order dated 23.12.2021 passed by the Children Court-cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge, Siwan in Cr. Appeal No. 44 of 2021, whereby and whereunder the order dated 25.10.2021 passed in connection with Bhagwanpur Hat P.S. Case No. 102 of 2021 refusing bail to the appellant, has

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.522 of 2022(6) dt.08-12-2022 2/3

¶18

been confirmed.

¶19

On bare perusal of provision of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, it appears that Juvenile in conflict with law shall be released on bail unless there appears reasonable grounds for believing that the release is likely to bring him into association with any known criminal or expose him to moral, physical or psychological danger or that his release would defeat the ends of justice.

¶20

The impugned order mentions that the release of the appellant would defeat the ends of justice and his release is likely to bring him into physical or psychological danger on account of dispute between two communities of two villages.

¶21

The existence of the aforesaid grounds should not mean guesswork but it should be supported by some evidence on record such as report of the probation officer etc. The report of the probation officer does not mentions anything as has been recorded by the Children Court. Further the report of the probation officer suggests that the conduct of the appellant has been found to be good and no comment has been made with regard to his behaviour before this incident.

¶22

As such, the rejection of the prayer for bail of the

¶23

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.522 of 2022(6) dt.08-12-2022 3/3

¶24

appellant is unjustified and against the intention of the provision of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. The same is, accordingly, set aside.

¶25

Let the appellant, above named, be enlarged on bail on execution of surety bond by the parents/close relative of the appellant giving undertaking that they shall keep proper care and upkeep of the appellant and shall fully co-operate in the pending enquiry/trial.

¶26

The appeal stands disposed of.

¶27

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶28

utkarsh/-vaishali

¶29

U T

Mohit Kumar @ Mohit Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohit Kumar @ Mohit Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bipin Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Neera Devi @ Nira Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Meraj Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shah Konain @ Kaunen Vs the State of Bihar