Allowed

Md. Meraj v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Dec 2022CR. APP (SJ)/2496/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail appeal against an order of the Children Court. The Court set aside the rejection as unjustified due to lack of recorded evidence and directed the release of the minor appellant on bail with specific monitoring conditions.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order allowing child to be in danger without evidence set aside; appellant directed to be enlarged on bail with conditions of surety, probation officer vigil, and cooperation in trial.

Md. Meraj Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINALAPPEAL (SJ) No.2496 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2021 Thana- SANHAULA District- Bhagalpur

¶3

MD. MERAJ Son of Md. Nayeemuddin Resident of village - Chammachak, P.S.- Goradih, District – Bhagalpur under the care and guardianship of his father namely Md. Nayeemuddin aged about 53 years S/o Jahir, R/o Vill. Champachak, P.S. Goradih, Dist. Bhagalpur.

¶4

... ... Appellant/s

¶5

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Md. Najmul Hodda For the Respondent/s : Mr. Choubey Jawahar ======================================================

¶6

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶7

6 08-12-2022

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

¶9

This is an appeal under Section 101(5) of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 filed against the order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, (Children Court), Bhagalpur in connection with Special Case (Children) No. 10 of 2022 arising out of Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 105 of 2011.

¶10

The impugned order mentions that if the appellant is released on bail, there is likelihood of physical and psychological danger to the child.

¶11

The existence of the aforesaid grounds should

¶12

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2496 of 2022(6) dt.08-12-2022 2/3

¶13

not mean guesswork but it should be supported by some evidence on record such as report of the probation officer etc. The Children Court has not recorded any evidence in support of its finding.

¶14

The Social Investigation Report suggests that there seems to be a need for proper counseling of the child and his parents so that in future the activities of the child and his friends can be specially monitored. Further it mentions that the appellant has no criminal antecedent. In such circumstances, the appellant may be ordered to do some social work for some period so that he may learn about the social values.

¶15

As such, the rejection of the prayer for bail of the appellant is unjustified and against the intention of the provision of Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 21.06.2022 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (Children Court), Bhagalpur in connection with Special Case (children) No. 10 of 2022 arising out of Sanhaula P.S. Case No. 105 of 2021 is set aside.

¶16

Under the aforementioned circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that the appellant should be released

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2496 of 2022(6) dt.08-12-2022 3/3

¶18

on bail with some conditions. Accordingly, the appellant, above named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on following terms and conditions:-

¶19

(i) The natural guardian of the appellant shall execute a surety bond giving undertaking that upon release on bail the appellant will not be permitted to come into contact or association with any known criminal or allowed to be exposed to any moral, physical or psychological danger and further that the natural guardian will ensure that the appellant will not repeat the offence;

¶20

(ii) The District Probation Officer will keep strict vigil on the activities of the appellant and regularly draw up his social investigation report that would be submitted to the Juvenile Justice Board on such periodical basis as the Juvenile Justice Board may determine; and

¶21

(iii) The appellant shall fully co-operate in the pending inquiry/trial.

¶22

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶23

shailendra/-

¶24

U T

Md. Meraj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Meraj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bipin Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Neera Devi @ Nira Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mohit Kumar @ Mohit Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shah Konain @ Kaunen Vs the State of Bihar