An oral order in Criminal Appeal No.344 of 2022 where the appellate court granted permission to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the appeal was allowed. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.344 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2014 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar
======================================================
Chhotak Yadav @ Chotak Yadav, Male, aged about 65 years, Son of Late Sheo Prasad Yadav, Resident of Village - Girdhar Baraon, P.S.- Nawanagar (Sonbarsa), District- Buxar.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sujit Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
ORAL ORDER
2 09-02-2022 Heard the parties through video conferencing.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within four
weeks of starting of the court proceeding in physical mode
properly.
Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to
withdraw this appeal.
Prayer is allowed.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J)
Anand Kr.
U T
Chhotak Yadav @ Chotak Yadav
The State of Bihar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
