The court dismissed a civil miscellaneous application challenging the transfer of a title appeal from Nalanda to Hilsa, finding the impugned order well-reasoned and no interference needed.
The application challenging the transfer order is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.282 of 2021
======================================================
Ramji Prasad Singh son of Garabhu Mahto @ Garbhu Singh resident of Village Saydanpur, Post Office and Police Station Hilsa, District Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Santosh Kumar Sinha 2 For the Respondent/s : Mr.Ravi Shanker Pankaj
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 26-11-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to
remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within
one month.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing.
Vide impugned order dated 04.11.2020, the learned District judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif has transferred Title Appeal No. 41 of 2007 to the court of A.D.J.-I, Hilsa from the
Patna High Court C.Misc. No.282 of 2021(2) dt.26-11-2021 2/2
court of Additional District judge-I, Nalanda at Biharsharif.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that before transferring the case, no opportunity of being heard was provided to him.
The learned District judge has mentioned the reason for transferring the case in the impugned order itself. The reason was that the court of Additional District judge-I, Biharsharif was vacant and the case was lying in a vacant court. Learned counsel for the petitioner did not clarify as to why he wanted to oppose the transfer order and as to why he is aggrieved by that order. The order of the learned District judge is well-reasoned and need not any interference.
This application is accordingly dismissed.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
HR/-
U
Ramji Prasad Singh
Prabha Devi
Sanjeev Kumar
Sunita Sinha
Sujata Kumari
Archana Kumari
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
