The High Court of Patna granted permission to withdraw a writ application filed by Suraj Devi against electoral authorities, as the counsel submitted it had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The application was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ application was granted; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.245 of 2021
======================================================
Suraj Devi W/o Vijay Prasad Resident of 72, Mohanpur, Town/VillMohanpur, Anchal- Rajgir, Dist.- Nalanda- 803111. Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Avanish Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Archana Meenakshee, GP 6 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that by the efflux of time, this writ application has become infructuous and he, accordingly, seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is granted.
This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.)
Prabhakar Anand/-
U √
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ application should be allowed to be withdrawn due to efflux of time.
Suraj Devi
Election Commission Bihar
District Magistrate Nalanda
Chief Executive Officer Nalanda Zila Parishad
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
