Disposed

Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC5 Aug 2021CWJC/8356/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Patna allowed an interlocutory application filed by the petitioner. The court directed the petitioner to file an appeal against the impugned administrative order before the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department within 30 days, and subsequently disposed of the writ application.

What did the court decide?

Allowed I.A. No.1 of 2019; directed petitioner to file appeal before Principal Secretary within 30 days; disposed of writ application.

Dilip Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8356 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Dilip Kumar Son of Sri Ramji Paswan, Resident of Village- Bajitpur, P.S.Muffasil, District- Begusarai.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Joint Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Deputy Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate-cum-District Program Co-ordinator, Manrega, Munger.

¶10

The Deputy Development Commissioner, Munger.

¶11

The Sub Divisional Officer, Munger.

¶12

The Block Development Officer, Asagarganj, District- Munger.

¶13

... ... Respondent/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Siyaram Shahi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harish Kumar-G.P.-8.

¶17

======================================================

¶18

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶19

6 05-08-2021

¶20

Heard Mr. Siyaram Shahi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Harish Kumar, learned G.P.-8, appearing for the State, through Video Conferencing.

¶21

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 25.07.2017, contained in Memo No.1235, passed by respondent No.4, District Magistrate-cum-District Programme Co-ordinator, Manrega, Munger, which has been challenged by the petitioner by way of filing amendment petition, vide Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2019 (Annexure-12 to the I.A.).

¶22

Learned counsel for the State submits that the order dated 25.07.2017, (Annexure-12), which has been challenged by the petitioner by way of filing amendment application is

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.8356 of 2018(2) dt.05-08-2021 2/2

¶24

appealable before the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department Bihar, Patna.

¶25

In view of the aforesaid, I.A. No.1 of 2019 is allowed.

¶26

After hearing the parties, the petitioner is directed to file an appeal against the order dated 25.07.2017 (Annexure-12) before the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna within a period of 30 days from today.

¶27

Needless to say that if such appeal is filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid period, the Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Bihar, Patna shall dispose the same in accordance with law by a speaking and reasoned order within a period of three months from the date of filing of appeal.

¶28

With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application is disposed of.

¶29

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶30

sanjeev/-

¶31

U T

Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Taousif @ Md. Tahseeb @ Md. Tausif @ Md. Tousir Vs the State of Bihar

Ravindra Kumar @ Rabindra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sakir Darzi Vs The State of Bihar

Baidya Nath Raut Vs The Chief Counsellor

Dr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Lalan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar