Disposed

Baidya Nath Raut v. The Chief Counsellor

Patna HC5 Aug 2021CWJC/5775/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning unpaid retirement benefits by following a previous identical order, directing the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the concerned executive officer.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed in same terms as CWJC No. 5962 of 2020; petitioner directed to file representation before Respondent No. 3 within two weeks.

Baidya Nath Raut Vs The Chief Counsellor — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5775 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Baidya Nath Raut Son of Bihari Raut Resident of Mohalla- Red Cross Road, Ward No.19, P.S. and District- Madhubani.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Chief Counsellor Nagar Parishad, Madhubani.

¶7

The Deputy Chief Counsellor, Nagar Parishad, Madhubani.

¶8

The Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Madhubani.

¶9

The Bill Clerk, Nagar Parishad, Madhubani.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain, Advocate For the Respondent/s : None. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶14

3 05-08-2021 Heard Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain, learned counsel for

¶15

the petitioner.

¶16

Nobody appears for Nagar Parishad, Madhubani.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

¶18

petitioner has retired on 31.01.2019 from the post of Upper Division Clerk, but nothing has been paid to the petitioner towards the post retiral benefits. Learned counsel next submits that similar matter has been disposed of by this Court in a writ application filed by the retired employee of Madhubani Nagar Parishad passed in CWJC No. 5962 of 2020 dated 24.7.2021 wherein this Court has directed the petitioner to file a detailed representation before Respondent No. 3 within a period of two

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.5775 of 2020(3) dt.05-08-2021 2/2

¶20

weeks’ from the date of order. Learned counsel further submits that the case of the petitioner is similar in nature and the same is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in CWJC No. 5962 of 2020.

¶21

In view of the submission made above, this writ application is disposed of exactly in the same terms of the order dated 24.7.2021 passed by this Court in CWJC No. 5962 of 2020 with a direction to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before Respondent No.3 within a period of two weeks’ from today.

¶22

Needless to say that if such representation is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be disposed of in accordance with law by a reasoned order within a further period of two months from the date of filing of representation and if any admissible amount is found payable to the petitioner, the same shall be paid by the respondents within one month from the date of disposal of the representation.

¶23

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶24

S.Ali/-

¶25

Baidya Nath Raut v. The Chief Counsellor

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baidya Nath Raut v. The Chief Counsellor

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Taousif @ Md. Tahseeb @ Md. Tausif @ Md. Tousir Vs the State of Bihar

Ravindra Kumar @ Rabindra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Sakir Darzi Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Lalan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar