Oral order in a criminal writ jurisdiction case where the court dismissed the application for default due to the petitioner's non-appearance on the second consecutive date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2246 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2017 Thana- PUPRI District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Sharma son of Bhultun Thakur @ Bhuntun Sharma, resident of Village and P.O. Chainpura, P.S. Pupri, DistrictSitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr.Manish Kumar Gp-4
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
consecutive date. Learned AC to GP 4 for the State is present.
This application is dismissed for default.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Prakash/-
U
Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Sharma
The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar
The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi
The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi
The Sub- Divisional Police Officer, Pupri
The Station Head Officer, Pupri Police Station
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
