Petitioner withdrew the criminal writ application under Section 482 CrPC with liberty to pursue alternate remedy. Court disposed of the instant application accordingly.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to pursue alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2249 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2017 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Rohtas
======================================================
Santosh Singh S/o Ram Pravesh Singh, R/o Village- Kanchanpur, P.S.Sasaram, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raghwanand, GA 11
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
for the State.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that as a result of subsequent developments which have taken place during pendency of the instant application, he seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to pursue the alternate remedy available to him in accordance with law.
This application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Spd/-
U T
Santosh Singh
The State of Bihar
Partha Sarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
