Allowed

Raju Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Dec 2021CR. MISC./19124/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after he had remained in custody for one year, directing him to furnish a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the Special Judge, Excise, Saran.

Raju Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19124 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-320 Year-2020 Thana- AWTARNAGAR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJU RAI SON OF JAWAHAR RAI @ JAWAHIR RAY R/O VILLAGEBARDHKA SANDHA, P.S.- AWTAR NAGAR, DISTRICT- SARAN (CHAPRA).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar Tiwari, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 07-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 30, 30(a) and 37(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶12

As per the prosecution case, 100 litres of country liquor was recovered from possession of the petitioner.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no incriminating article has been recovered from his possession. He has been falsely implicated in the case. A supplementary affidavit has been filed in the case bringing on record a copy of the receipt to the effect that the petitioner has deposited a cost of Rs.20,000/ with the Patna High Court Legal Services Committee. The petitioner is in custody since

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19124 of 2021(5) dt.07-12-2021 2/2

¶15

2.12.2020 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶16

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶17

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case specially the petitioner having remained in custody for one year, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Awtarnagar P.S. Case no. 320 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge, Excise, Saran.

¶18

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶19

Bibhash/-

¶20

Raju Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Forest Department Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Shankar Dayal Singh Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Forest Department Government Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Kumar Chaurasiya Vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary Forest Department Government Of Bihar, Patna Ors.

Rakesh Kumar Vs the Central Bureau of Investigation (C.B.I.) New Delhi

Rajesh Kushwaha @ Rajesh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna and Ors.