This order allowed a restoration application filed to revive Criminal Miscellaneous No. 29049 of 2019, which had previously been dismissed for want of prosecution.
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 29049 of 2019 is restored to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54696 of 2021
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29049 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-51 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Lakhisarai
======================================================
ABHISHEK PRASAD S/o- T. Prasad Resident of Village- Mani Ratnam, Near Anuradha Hall, Banichatti, Durgapur-13/ District- Burdhman (West – Bengal)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajnish Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
the petitioner and Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State.
This application has been filed for restoration of Cr. Misc. No. 29049 of 2019 which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 16.8.2019.
For the reasons stated in the restoration application and the submission made in support thereof, I am inclined to allow the restoration application.
Accordingly, this restoration application is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54696 of 2021(2) dt.22-09-2021 2/2
allowed and the Cr. Misc. No. 29049 of 2019 is restored to its original file.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
S.Ali/-
U T
Abhishek Prasad
State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
