Disposed

Sudisht Narayan Jha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Sept 2021CWJC/2953/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ application challenging Notice under Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act and subsequent dispossession. Court exempted petitioner from alternative remedy requirement and directed him to file appeal before District Magistrate/Collector.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file Appeal before District Magistrate/Collector within six weeks; Respondent No.3 to dispose appeal within three months; Writ application disposed.

Sudisht Narayan Jha Vs The State of Bihar — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2953 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sudisht Narayan Jha, Son of Ganesh Jha, Resident of Village- Kaligaon, P.O. and P.S.- Kaligaon, Anchal- Sighwara, District- Darbhanga.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Principal Secretaary, Revenue and Land Reform, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate-cum- Collector, Darbhanga.

¶9

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Darbhanga.

¶10

The Circle Officer, Sighwara, District- Darbhagna.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Upendra Pratap Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, AC to AAG-12. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 21-09-2021

¶15

Heard Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel

¶16

for the petitioner and Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, learned AC to AAG12 appearing for the State.

¶17

Petitioner was aggrieved by the Notice dated 26.12.2019, issued by Circle Officer, Sighwara, Darbhanga (respondent No.5) under Section 3 and (6)(2) of Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act by which the petitioner was directed to file his objection regarding the encroachment upon the subject land and as to why the said encroachment be not removed under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.2953 of 2020(4) dt.21-09-2021 2/3

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this writ application, without considering the objection filed by the petitioner, the Circle Officer, Sighwara, Darbhang has dispossessed the petitioner from his Raiyati land bearing Khata No.2015 plot No.1472.

¶20

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that order for removal of encroachment from the public land in question has been passed after taking into consideration the objection filed by the petitioner which would be evident from the ordersheet of Encroachment Case No.18/2019 Annexed with the counter affidavit.

¶21

Learned counsel for the State further submits that the order dated 03.01.2020 passed by C.O, Sighwara, Darbhang is appealable order under Section 11 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act and the petitioner may be directed to seek alternative remedy of appeal before the District Magistrate/ Collector, Darbhanga.

¶22

After having heard learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion upon merit of the case, the petitioner is directed to prefer an Appeal before the District Magistrate/ Collector, Darbhanga within a period of six weeks and if such appeal is filed along with the condonation of delay

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.2953 of 2020(4) dt.21-09-2021 3/3

¶24

petition, the respondent No.3 is directed to dispose the same in accordance with law on its own merit within a period of three months from the date of filing of Appeal.

¶25

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application is disposed.

¶26

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

¶27

sanjeev/-

¶28

Sudisht Narayan Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudisht Narayan Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ruby Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Dip Narain Mishra Vs Lalit Narayan Mithila University

Amrun Nisha Vs The State of Bihar

Meena Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

Avdhesh Prasad @ Awadhesh Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar