Single judge order dismissing a criminal miscellaneous application for want of prosecution due to repeated non-appearance by the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4211 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA PS District- East Champaran
======================================================
AJAY SAH @ AJAY KUMAR @ AJAY KUMAR SAH S/o Dukha Sah Resident of Village- Katahariya, P.S.- Kesariya, Distt- East Champran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar No. 2 For the Informant : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
9 08-03-2021
On repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application. On the previous occasion i.e. on 09.02.2021 and 01.03.2021, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
However, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant are present.
In such view of the matter, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
shailendra/-
U T
Ajay Sah
The State of Bihar
Mamta Devi
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
