Hon'ble Arvind Srivastava, J. dismissed the application for anticipatory bail filed by Golu Kumar in case pending for alleged theft and forgery, holding that recovery of the stolen motorcycle from the petitioner's house precludes grant of bail.
No anticipatory bail granted; prayer of the petitioner rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30244 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2019 Thana- BAHADURPUR District- Darbhanga
======================================================
GOLU KUMAR @ AJIT KUMAR Son of Raj Kumar Yadav Ward No. 1, Taralahi, Bahadurpur, P.S.- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga- Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jagnnath Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
2 05-03-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bahadurpur P.S. Case No. 153 of 2019 registered under Sections 414/467/468/34 of I.P.C. pending in the Court of S.D.J.M., Darbhanga.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that the theft motorcycle has been recovered from the house of the petitioner. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30244 of 2020(2) dt.05-03-2021 2/2
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
shailendra/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in the miscellaneous case regarding charges of theft and forgery.
Golu Kumar @ Ajit Kumar
The State of Bihar
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
