Single judge ordered anticipatory bail for three petitioners facing charges under various IPC sections for assault and robbery, directing surrender within four weeks and furnishing a bond with sureties.
Enlargement on bail on surrender within four weeks by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39881 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2020 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.P.P. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
3 06-12-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking to remove the defects as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office.
The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case no. 86 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per allegation in the FIR, when the son of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39881 of 2020(3) dt.06-12-2021 2/3
informant came to know by Amin during land measurement that five feet of his land is in possession of his neighbour Asraf Khan, he informed the same to Asraf Khan upon which he became violant and started to assault him by fists and slaps. All the accused persons including the petitioners went to his house and assaulted the informant on his head by tangi resulting into his head injury and he fell down. Petitioner no. 2 snatched Rs. 2000/- cash from his pocket.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case. Allegation against petitioner no. 1 is of assaulting to the son of the informant, who has received simple injury. There is no specific allegation of assault against petitioner nos. 2 and 3. Allegation levelled against all the petitioners are general and omnibus in nature. They have no criminal antecedent.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39881 of 2020(3) dt.06-12-2021 3/3
period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Mirganj P.S. Case no. 86 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 16th , Gopalganj subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
sushma/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipation bail can be granted to the petitioners apprehending arrest under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Afroz Khan
Firoz Khan
Parwez Alam
The State of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
