Patna High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder case alleging direct firing on the deceased, rejecting the claim of false implication arising from a family dispute.
Prayer for bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29394 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-247 Year-2019 Thana- BAKHTIYARPUR District- Patna
======================================================
VIKKY ALAM Son of Md. Akhtar Resident of Village- Chakdaulat, P.S.Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.G. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
3 09-02-2021
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 247 of 2019 for the offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, petitioner and the informant happens to be step brother and there is partition dispute between them and on account of same, the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is rotting in judicial custody since 05.08.2019.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29394 of 2020(3) dt.09-02-2021 2/2
for bail and submitted that there is direct allegation of opened fire on the chest of the deceased against the petitioner resultantly she died.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
Brajesh/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Vicky Alam
The State of Bihar
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
