Ganpati Harijan v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Patna dismissed the writ petition ex parte for the petitioner's non-appearance and want of prosecution on 04-02-2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11287 of 2017
======================================================
Ganpati Harijan S/o Late Sukar Harijan, Resident of Chihar, P.S. Barahat, Distrit-Banka,
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mritunjay Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Pushkar Narain Shahi-Aag6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
8 04-02-2021 On several occasions, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Today also no one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondents are present.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
(Arvind Srivastava, J)
Jagdish/-
U
Ganpati Harijan
The State Of Bihar
The Collector, Banka
Block Development Officer, Katoriya
Arvind Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court