Dismissed

Md. Danish @ Md. Danish Iqbal v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Mar 2021CR. MISC./23322/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge rejected the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail due to their antecedent record, holding the High Court was not inclined to grant the privilege. The Court directed that if petitioners surrender and seek regular bail later, it will be considered promptly without prejudice to the refusal of anticipatory bail.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected. Permission to file regular bail application on surrender granted.

Md. Danish @ Md. Danish Iqbal Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23322 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2020 Thana- PIYAR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

====================================================== MD. DANISH @ MD. DANISH IQBAL S/o Md. Aslam Resident of VillageBangari, P.S.-Piar, O.P Hattha, District-Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

======================================================

¶9

with

¶10

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 25534 of 2020

¶11

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-25 Year-2020 Thana- PIYAR District- Muzaffarpur

¶12

====================================================== MD. ASLAM S/o Md. Mobin Resident of Village-Bangari, P.S.-Piar (O.PHattha), District-Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

¶13

... ... Petitioner/s

¶14

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 23322 of 2020) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umanath Mishra, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 25534 of 2020) For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶15

4 19-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the

¶16

State.

¶17

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Piar P.S. Case No. 25 of 2020 for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 IPC.

¶18

Having regard to the antecedent of the petitioners, the

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23322 of 2020(4) dt.19-03-2021 2/2

¶20

Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The prayer is rejected.

¶21

In the event the petitioners surrender and pray for regular bail before the Court below, the same shall be considered and disposed of on the same day without being prejudiced by the refusal of their anticipatory bail by this Court.

¶22

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶23

spandey/-

¶24

U T

Md. Danish @ Md. Danish Iqbal v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Danish @ Md. Danish Iqbal v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lalit Kumar Mehta Vs The State of Bihar

Priyanshu Shekhar Vs The State of Bihar

Maya Prasad Vs The State of Bihar through Collector

Rajendra Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Kamal Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Plasto Moulders Private Limited, Vs The State of Bihar