Allowed

Maya Prasad v. The State of Bihar through Collector

Patna HC18 Mar 2021CWJC/7261/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order addresses the petitioner's grievance regarding the refusal to register a document. The single-judge bench directed the Registrar to register the document within 15 days, maintaining consistency with a prior judgment.

What did the court decide?

The Registrar, Saran at Chapra is directed to register the document within 15 days from receipt/production of a copy of this order.

Maya Prasad Vs The State of Bihar through Collector — Property and Title | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7261 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Maya Prasad W/o Jwala Prasad R/o - B 14/173, Pharma Apartments, Patparganj, Plot No. 88, PS I P Extension, dist - East, Delhi, presently residing at C- 424 G and H, NRI City, Pari Chowk, Greater Noida, DistrictGautam Budhh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through Collector, Chapra, Saran.

¶7

I.G., Registration, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

District Magistrate cum Registrar, Chapra, Saran

¶9

Sub- Registrar, Chapra, Saran.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Saket Tiwary, Advocate For the State : Mr.Puskar Narain Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sanjeet Kr. Singh, AC to AAG-6 ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 18-03-2021

¶15

Grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is refusal to register the document presented by the petitioner for registration.

¶16

Leaned counsel for the petitioner submits that registering authority under the Registration Act is only obliged to examine whether the document presented for registration is in order or not and the requisition fee has been paid.

¶17

The aforesaid aspect was considered by different benches of this Court including this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 2524 of 2018 in which Mr. Puskar Narain Shahi has also appeared on behalf of the State and after hearing Mr. Shahi this Court has

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.7261 of 2021(2) dt.18-03-2021 2/2

¶19

disposed of the writ application with a direction to the Registrar, Saran at Chapra to register the document presented by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶20

In order to maintain consistency, the present writ application is also disposed of in similar terms of C.W.J.C. No. 2524 of 2018 was disposed of vide order dated 19.4.2019.

¶21

The Registrar, Saran at Chapra is hereby directed to register the document for registration within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order .

¶22

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶23

Ravi/-

¶24

Maya Prasad v. The State of Bihar through Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maya Prasad v. The State of Bihar through Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Supriya Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Binod Kumar Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Lalit Kumar Mehta Vs The State of Bihar

Priyanshu Shekhar Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Mallick Vs The State of Bihar