Allowed

Priyanshu Shekhar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Mar 2021CWJC/6964/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Land Encroachment Case, the Patna High Court held that a notice issued by the Circle Officer against a deceased person was a nullity and without jurisdiction. The writ petition was allowed, the notice was quashed, and the authority was directed to provide an opportunity of hearing to the heirs.

What did the court decide?

Notice dated 19.9.2020 quashed; authority directed to provide opportunity of hearing to petitioner and pass appropriate order within six months.

Priyanshu Shekhar Vs The State of Bihar — Public Procurement and Tenders | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6964 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Priyanshu Shekhar Son of Late Ashish Yadav Resident of Village- Bahera, P.O. and P.S. and District- Banka.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Banka.

¶7

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Banka.

¶8

The Circle Officer, Banka.

¶9

The Halka Karamchari, Circle Office, Banka.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Raj Kishore Raj, GP-18 Mr. Mukul Pd. AC to GP-18

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 18-03-2021 Grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is that in Land Encroachment Case No. 01/2020-21 notice was issued by the respondent, Circle Officer, Banka after death of Ashish Yadav, the father of the petitioner without taking steps for substitution of the heirs of the late Ashish Yadav.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the notice against a dead person is nullity. He submits in all fairness that the Circle Officer was required to provide opportunity of hearing to the heirs of dead Ashish Yadav.

¶18

Considering the fact that before issuing notice, the father of the petitioner died in February,2020, the notice against a dead person is nullity, accordingly, the writ petition is allowed.

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.6964 of 2021(2) dt.18-03-2021 2/2

¶20

The notice dated 19.9.2020 issued by the Circle Officer, Banka is quashed as it is without jurisdiction. The respondent, Circle Officer, Banka is directed to provide opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate order in Land Encroachment Case No. 01/2020-21 at the earliest, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶21

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶22

Ravi/-

¶23

Priyanshu Shekhar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Priyanshu Shekhar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Supriya Vs The State of Bihar

Sumit Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Binod Kumar Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Lalit Kumar Mehta Vs The State of Bihar

Maya Prasad Vs The State of Bihar through Collector

Santosh Kumar Mallick Vs The State of Bihar