Dismissed

Raju Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Dec 2021CR. MISC./21678/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench dismissed a bail application in a narcotics case where 133.510 kgs of ganja were recovered from a vehicle involving the petitioner. Despite claims of conflicting FIR details, the Court rejected bail due to the large quantity involved and directed trial acceleration.

What did the court decide?

Bail application is rejected; learned trial court directed to expedite the trial.

Raju Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21678 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2020 Thana- ATHMALGOLA District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJU KUMAR SON OF LATE VAKIL RAY R/O VILLAGE- SUNDAR NAGAR, P.S.- SALIMPUR, DISTRICT- PATNA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶12

5 16-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶14

of regular bail in a case registered under sections 22(C) and 27(A) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, 133.510 kgs of ganja was recovered from the vehicle in which the petitioner was also present.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The learned court below has committed an error of record as the quantity of ganja recovered even as per the F.I.R. was not 133.510 kgs but 77.460 kgs. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 16.6.2020. There is no progress in the case in the learned court below.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21678 of 2021(5) dt.16-12-2021 2/2

¶18

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

¶20

taking into consideration the facts of the case whereby large quantity of ganja was recovered from the vehicle in which the petitioner was also present, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

¶21

Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial.

¶22

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶23

Saurabh/-

¶24

U T

Raju Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tej Bali Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar Sahni @ Ranjit Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjay Yadav Vs the State of Bihar