Allowed

Dinesh Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Dec 2021CR. MISC./17467/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under the NDPS Act, the Patna High Court granted the petitioner's request for regular bail. The petitioner, held in custody since December 2020 with no criminal record, was directed to furnish a bail bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail enlarged on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the learned Special Judge (NDPS), Kishanganj.

Dinesh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17467 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2020 Thana- FATEHPUR District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DINESH MAHTO Son of Late Nand Lal Mahto Resident of Village - Amat Toli Khaniyabad, P.S.- Fatehpur, Distt.- Kishanganj.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. N.K.Agrawal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv. Ms. Preety Kunwar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dilip Kumar no.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 15-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶11

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant

¶12

of regular bail in a case registered under sections 8(b), 15(b) and 18(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, it is stated that opium plants were found cultivated over 2 decimals area of land belonging to the petitioner.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. He has no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 12.12.2020. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶15

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17467 of 2021(4) dt.15-12-2021 2/2

¶18

taking into consideration the facts of the case, the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent and having remained in custody for 1 year, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case no.3 of 2020 (Special Case no.4 of 2020) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge (NDPS Act), Kishanganj.

¶19

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶20

Saurabh/-

¶21

U T

Dinesh Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Mahto v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shambhu Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Khelawan Yadav Vs State of Bihar, through Principal Secretary, Home Deptt. Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

Tej Bali Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar Sahni @ Ranjit Sahni Vs The State of Bihar