Allowed

Rohit Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Dec 2021CR. MISC./26560/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a Section 392 IPC case involving a robbery. The Court noted the petitioner was falsely implicated, had no antecedents, and had already been in custody for over 10 months pending chargesheet submission.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.

Rohit Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26560 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2021 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ROHIT KUMAR RAM S/O SANJAY RAM R/o village- Jarigaawa, P.S.Buxar (Mufassil), District- Buxar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 10-12-2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

¶13

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per the prosecution case, four accused persons looted the pick up van after hiring the same.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the F.I.R. was registered against unknown. The petitioner was falsely implicated in course of investigation when his name was taken by co-accused Rohit Dubey in his statement made before police. It has falsely been stated that a stolen mobile phone was recovered from the petitioner’s possession. The petitioner is in custody since 23.1.2021 and has no criminal

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26560 of 2021(3) dt.10-12-2021 2/2

¶17

antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

¶18

Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶19

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the material that has transpired in course of investigation, the petitioner having remained in custody for more than 10 months and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Buxar (M) P.S. Case no.31 of 2021 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

¶20

(Partha Sarthy, J)

¶21

Saurabh/-

¶22

U T

Rohit Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Kumar Ram v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aslam Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Mohan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Arun Sahani Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Faryad Vs the State of Bihar