A writ petition for anticipatory bail was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel after he was arrested during the pendency, rendering the application infructuous.
Application dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17391 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
RAJU RAY @ RAJ KISHORE KUMAR S/o Bhola Ray Resident of VillageSujawalpur, P.S.- Sakra, Distt- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Hari Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 03-11-2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of this anticipatory bail application, the petitioner has been arrested and, as such, the same has become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this application.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the application is dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
HR/-
U T
RAJU RAY @ RAJ KISHORE KUMAR
NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
