The appeal against the rejection of anticipatory bail was dismissed as not maintainable because the party was not mentioned as a previous enemy in the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1120 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2020 Thana- SC/ST District- Patna
======================================================
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Yadav For the Respondent/s : Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 02-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the appellants.
Learned counsel for the appellants is directed to
remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.
This appeal has been preferred on behalf of the appellant under Section 14-A (2) of the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for setting aside the order dated 08.09.2020, passed by the learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Patna, in connection with SC/ST Act P.S.Case No. 16 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(s), 3(2) (vs) SC/ST Act, whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1120 of 2021(2) dt.02-11-2021 2/2
has been rejected.
As per the allegation, the appellants in drunken condition abused the informant by calling his caste name and also assaulted him. They also pressed his throat, but he was saved by the villagers.
There is specific allegation of abusing the informant by calling his case name as well as assault by these five appellants. It has not been mentioned that there was previous enmity and the cause of occurrence is previous enmity between the parties. Prima facie, the provision of SC/ST Act attracts to the present case. As such, appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the appellant within the stipulated time provided in para 2 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
HR/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act for setting aside the order rejecting anticipatory bail is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kolej Ray
Guddu Kumar
Pirthivi Ray
Tiger Kumar
Deva Ray
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
