Kamleshwari Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 26-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Bhargama P.S. Case No. 42 of 2020 corresponding to Special Case No. 367 of 2020 registered for the offence under sections 188, 272, 273, 269, 270/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act is made out against the petitioners, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is not maintainable in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12139 of 2021(2) dt.26-11-2021 2/2

¶15

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is

¶16

dismissed as not maintainable.

¶17

Learned counsel or the petitioners is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

¶18

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶19

Ravi/-

¶20

U T

Kamleshwari Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kamleshwari Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashutosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Pravin Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Satyendra Pandit Vs the State of Bihar

Raj Kumar Sahani @ Raj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Birendra Bind @ Birendra Bin Vs the State of Bihar