Partly allowed

Lalbabu Sahni @ Lalbabu Chaudhary v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Sept 2021CR. APP (SJ)/2585/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Partitioning of a criminal appeal concerning anticipatory bail under SC/ST Act and other IPC offences. Permission granted for withdrawal by three appellants taken into custody while anticipating bail was allowed for the appellant residing.

What did the court decide?

Appeal by Nos.1,3,4 dismissed as withdrawn; appeal by No.2 allowed with release on personal bond upon arrest/surrender, subject to furnishing sureties after normalcy.

Lalbabu Sahni @ Lalbabu Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2585 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-34 Year-2021 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

LALBABU SAHNI @ LALBABU CHAUDHARY Son of Kishun Sahni Resident of Village - Majuraha, Raghunathpur O.P., Police Station - Turkauliya, District - East Champaran.

¶5

Vina Devi Wife of Lalbabu Sahni @ Lalbabu Chaudhary Resident of Village - Majuraha, Raghunathpur O.P., Police Station - Turkauliya, District - East Champaran.

¶6

Kishun Sahni Son of Lalbabu Sahni @ Lalbabu Chaudhary Resident of Village - Majuraha, Raghunathpur O.P., Police Station - Turkauliya, District - East Champaran.

¶7

Sujit Kumar @ Golu Kumar Son of Lalbabu Sahni @ Lalbabu chaudhary Resident of Village - Majuraha, Raghunathpur O.P., Police Station - Turkauliya, District - East Champaran.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Respondent/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binay Krishna, Spl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 09-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned

¶14

Spl. P.P. for the State through virtual mode.

¶15

Counsel for the appellants is directed to remove the

¶16

defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy.

¶17

Counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal on behalf of appellant Nos.1, 3 and 4, as the appellants Nos.1, 3 and 4 have been taken into judicial custody.

¶18

Permission is accorded.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2585 of 2021(2) dt.09-09-2021 2/3

¶20

The appeal filed on behalf of appellant Nos.1, 3 and 4 is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶21

The matter relates to grant of anticipatory bail to the appellant No.2 in connection with a case registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 385, 427/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(i)(r)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

¶22

The prosecution case, in short, is that the accused persons and 2 unknown ladies and 3 male came with arms and started abusing the informant by taking his caste name. Coaccused Lalbabu Sahani demanded extortion of Rs.2 lacs from the informant. The accused persons took away five bag cement.

¶23

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant No.2 that the appellant No.2 has got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the appellant No.2. The appellant No.2 has falsely been implicated in the present case. The date of occurrence is said to be 16.12.2020 and the case was instituted on 10.01.2021. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. The alleged occurrence has not taken place within public view. Hence no offence under the SC/ST Act is attracted in the present case.

¶24

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the

¶25

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2585 of 2021(2) dt.09-09-2021 3/3

¶26

appellant No.2 is named in the F.I.R.

¶27

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the order dated 18.02.2021, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, East Champaran at Motihari vide A.B.P. No.548 of 2021 in connection with Turkauliya P.S. case No.34 of 2021, is set aside with regard to appellant No.2 only. The criminal appeal is allowed in part.

¶28

Let the appellant No.2, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on her personal bond to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Turkauliya P.S. case No.34 of 2021.

¶29

Once the normalcy is restored, the appellant No.2 shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶30

Narendra/-

¶31

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶32

U T

Lalbabu Sahni @ Lalbabu Chaudhary v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalbabu Sahni @ Lalbabu Chaudhary v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aakash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Randhir Singh @ Randhir Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shamsher Shah @ Shamsher Ali Vs the State of Bihar

Manoj Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Khattik Vs The State of Bihar

Ajit Singh Vs The State of Bihar