Dismissed

Randhir Singh @ Randhir Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Sept 2021CR. MISC./15213/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Sudhir Singh rejected a bail application in a double murder case. Citing the prosecution stage, the court directed the trial court to conclude the trial within nine months and officials to produce witnesses promptly.

What did the court decide?

Bail application rejected; Trial Court directed to conclude trial within nine months; District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police directed to ensure witness production for speedy trial.

Randhir Singh @ Randhir Kumar Singh Vs The State… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15213 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-663 Year-2018 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RANDHIR SINGH @ RANDHIR KUMAR SINGH Son of Jamun Singh Resident of Village- Madhoul Sani, Police Station- Runnisaidpur, DistrictSitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vipin Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 08-09-2021

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out, by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy.

¶13

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Runnisaidpur P.S. case No.663 of 2018 registered under Sections 302, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of C.J.M., Sitamarhi.

¶14

The earlier bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure 1 to the present application taking into account that the case was related to double murder.

¶15

A report was called for from the trial court. It has been

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15213 of 2021(3) dt.08-09-2021 2/2

¶17

reported that out of seven prosecution witnesses, three prosecution witnesses have already been examined and one non official witness and three official witnesses are yet to be examined in the present case.

¶18

Considering the nature of accusation and the stage of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. The same is rejected.

¶19

The Trial Court is directed to take all necessary steps to conclude the trial preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶20

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi and the Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi are also directed to take necessary steps to produce the witnesses on the date fixed by the Trial Court so that the trial could be concluded within the stipulated period.

¶21

Let this order be communicated to the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi and the Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi.

¶22

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶23

Narendra/-

¶24

U T

Randhir Singh @ Randhir Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Randhir Singh @ Randhir Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajiv Ranjan Singh @ Raju Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sudhir Sahni Vs the State of Bihar

Dharmendra Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Aakash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shamsher Shah @ Shamsher Ali Vs the State of Bihar

Alam @ Md. Alam Vs The State of Bihar