Allowed

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Khattik v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Sept 2021CR. APP (SJ)/2116/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal appeal arising out of a case involving offences under IPC and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. This court set aside an order and allowed the criminal appeal, granting anticipatory bail to the appellants on personal bond subject to submission of monetary bail bonds within eight weeks after normalcy is restored.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; criminal appeal allowed; appellants granted anticipatory bail on personal bond, required to furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties within eight weeks after n

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Khattik Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.2116 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2019 Thana- DARBHANGA District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUNIL KUMAR @ SUNIL KHATTIK S/o- Late Ramashish Sah Resident of Village- Hasanchak, P.S.- Town, District- Darbhanga.

¶5

Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Khattik S/o- Dilip Prasad Resident of VillageHasanchak, P.S.- Town, District- Darbhanga.

¶6

Rajesh Prasad @ Rajesh Sah S/o- Bhola Prasad Sah Resident of VillageHasanchak, P.S.- Town, District- Darbhanga.

¶7

Krishna Kumar @ Krsihan Sah @ Krishna Kumar Bihari S/o- Bhola Prasad Sah @ Bhola Prasad Resident of Village- Hasanchak, P.S.- Town, DistrictDarbhanga.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Respondent/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Spl. P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 09-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned

¶14

Spl. P.P. for the State through virtual mode.

¶15

Counsel for the appellants is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy.

¶16

The matter relates to grant of anticipatory bail to the appellants in connection with a case registered for the offences under Sections 323, 341, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(1)(r) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

¶17

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2116 of 2021(2) dt.09-09-2021 2/3

¶18

The prosecution case, in short, is that the appellant No.1 assaulted the informant with lathi, danda. Appellant Nos.2 to 4 and 4-5 unknown persons assaulted the informant’s father and other family members of the informant and the accused persons abused them by taking their caste name.

¶19

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellants that the appellants have got no criminal antecedent and there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the appellants. The appellants have falsely been implicated in the present case. No grievous injury is said to have been caused in course of occurrence. So far the appellant Nos.2 to 4 are concerned, general and omnibus allegation has been made. It is a case and counter case between the parties. Free fight is alleged to have taken place. The case has been instituted after three days of the alleged occurrence. The alleged occurrence has not taken place within public view. Hence no offence under the SC/ST Act is attracted in the present case.

¶20

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the appellants are named in the F.I.R.

¶21

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the order dated 02.02.201, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge First-cum-Special Judge (POA Act), Darbhanga

¶22

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2116 of 2021(2) dt.09-09-2021 3/3

¶23

vide A.B.P. No.78 of 2021 in connection with Town P.S. case No.204 of 2019, is set aside. The criminal appeal is allowed.

¶24

Let the appellants, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on their personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge First-cum-Special Judge (POA Act), Darbhanga in connection with Town P.S. case No.204 of 2019.

¶25

Once the normalcy is restored, the appellants will furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

¶26

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶27

Narendra/-

¶28

U T

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Khattik v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Khattik v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aakash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Randhir Singh @ Randhir Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shamsher Shah @ Shamsher Ali Vs the State of Bihar

Manoj Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Lalbabu Sahni @ Lalbabu Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar

Ajit Singh Vs The State of Bihar